刀 Japan Stock Screener
AI screening example · run on October 22, 2026

Undervalued national resilience stocks,
across all of Japan.

Japan's national resilience budget requests have topped ¥8 trillion. We looked for companies built on that work that the market still leaves cheap. Katana kept 87 cheap, financially sound companies with growing sales, and AI read each annual report and supported 4.

Background

Japan's national resilience budget requests topped ¥8 trillion.

According to the Nikkan Kensetsu Kogyo Shimbun, the Cabinet Secretariat's national resilience office in September compiled budget requests of ¥8.18 trillion for fiscal 2027, 1.53 times the initial budget for the year before. The infrastructure ministry's share, ¥5.07 trillion, goes to basin-wide flood control, aging roads, and making water and sewer systems more disaster-proof and renewing them. Underneath sits a five-year plan for fiscal 2026 to 2030 with a project scale of a little over ¥20 trillion.

Disasters and aging advance even now. In August, Kumamoto Prefecture passed a ¥42.2 billion supplementary budget for repairs to roads and bridges and other work after the 2026 Kumamoto earthquake. In sewers, a national survey by the infrastructure ministry found that 748 km of old pipes 2 meters or wider need work.

The work already shows in Japanese earnings. Ueki, a Niigata builder, grew completed civil works for government clients 37%, from ¥14.0 billion to ¥19.2 billion. E-J Holdings, an engineering consultant, cites the five-year resilience plan in its annual report and expects steady business.

Hypothesis

The budget is set. Are some companies still left cheap?

National resilience comes with five years of planned spending. Aging bridges and sewer pipes only grow in number. Demand for this work is easy to see ahead.

But share prices are not set by demand alone. Well-known, heavily traded companies get bought and rated higher. Regional builders and engineering consultants are small, thinly traded and rarely followed by analysts. Even doing the same government work, they should be left cheap for lack of attention.

So we used Katana's financial data and annual reports to find cheap, financially sound, growing companies whose core business is national resilience work.

01 / Input

The companies we wanted to find.

“Among cheap, financially sound companies with growing sales, we want those whose core business is construction work, products, or services for public infrastructure in Japan, such as roads, bridges, rivers and levees, ports, or water supply and sewerage, and whose orders or sales for this work are increasing.”

In Katana's screen, we set five financial conditions for value, balance sheet strength and steady growth, which left 87 companies. We then turned this profile into three questions entered in English and had the AI read each report, question by question.

02 / Conditions

The conditions we applied across Japan.

A

Quantitative

Katana computes its metrics for every company.

  1. Trailing P/E ≤ 10 (based on the share price at fiscal year-end)
  2. P/B ≤ 1 (same basis)
  3. Kiyohara net cash ratio ≥ 0.75 (custom metric: current assets + 70% of investment securities − total liabilities, divided by market cap)
  4. Operating income ≥ 0 in each of the last seven years
  5. Five-year revenue CAGR ≥ 5%
B

Qualitative

AI reads each annual report and judges support and counterevidence.

  1. Does the company currently sell construction work, products, or services for public infrastructure in Japan — roads, bridges, tunnels, rivers and levees, dams, erosion and slope control, ports, or water supply and sewerage systems — such as new construction, repair, seismic reinforcement, renewal of aging facilities, inspection and diagnosis, design and consulting, or disaster prevention and recovery? (Exclude: work only on private buildings such as offices, housing, factories, or data centers; power grids and power plants; general-purpose products not specifically used for this infrastructure; cases where infrastructure or national resilience is mentioned only as market environment or a policy trend; future plans without current sales.)
  2. Does the company's business of construction work, products, or services for public infrastructure in Japan (roads, bridges, tunnels, rivers and levees, dams, erosion and slope control, ports, or water supply and sewerage systems) account for at least 20% of net sales, or form an independent reportable segment (for example, a civil engineering segment), or is it explicitly described in the report as the company's core or main business?
  3. Does the annual report state that orders received, order backlog, or sales of the company's construction work, products, or services for public infrastructure in Japan (roads, bridges, tunnels, rivers and levees, dams, erosion and slope control, ports, or water supply and sewerage systems) increased in the latest fiscal year?

The questions were entered in English and judged in order.

~3,800listed companies
87match the numbers
4AI judged as supported
Katana

read the filings and supported 4.

03 / Results

4 supported. We dropped 1, added 3 that needed review, and checked all 6 against the source.

Of 87 companies, 4 were supported, 4 need review and 79 had counterevidence. Below are the 6, in order: builders, engineering consultants, then a pump maker.

  • Ueki1867 · Construction

    Lists a deeper-than-expected cut in public works as a risk to earnings.Filing ↗A Niigata builder. Civil works are 56% of completed construction, and civil works for government clients rose 37% to ¥19.2 billion, including river levees and seismic reinforcement of tide walls. P/B 0.58, dividend yield 4.3%.

  • Santo Kogyosha1788 · Construction

    Its civil engineering covers flood and erosion control, water and sewer, land preparation, ports and airports, and roads.Filing ↗Civil engineering is 50.8% of sales, and its sales rose 12.2%. A small company worth ¥2.7 billion, at P/B 0.70. Of its ¥130 dividend, ¥60 is a special dividend.

  • Moriya1798 · Construction

    Says orders stayed strong, supported by public investment from continued national resilience policy and steady private investment.Filing ↗Judged as needing review. A builder focused on buildings, but civil engineering is a separate segment whose orders rose 19.3%. P/E 4.8. It split each share into five in April 2026; adjusted for the split, its dividend is ¥36 a share, a yield of about 3%.

  • E-J Holdings2153 · Services

    Expects steady business for engineering consultants under the five-year, roughly ¥20 trillion national resilience plan.Filing ↗An engineering consultant for the infrastructure ministry and local governments, which make up about 70% of sales. Operating income stayed between ¥4.3 and ¥4.7 billion over five years. It commits to progressive dividends with a target of at least 3% of equity. Dividend yield 4.2%.

  • Kyowa Consultants9647 · Services

    Expects demand to stay high in disaster prevention, national resilience and defense base work.Filing ↗Judged as needing review. Engineering consulting is 83.1% of sales. Orders fell 13.5% after large multi-year defense and other contracts the year before, but the backlog rose 2.0% and sales 4.7%. P/E 6.2. Its ¥30 dividend is a 3% payout.

  • Dengyosha Machine Works6365 · Machinery

    Orders rose to ¥27.0 billion as the public sector and domestic private sector both grew.Filing ↗Judged as needing review. A maker of large pumps for stormwater drainage, sewers and farm water. The public sector is 67% of sales, and its orders rose 2.5%. Nine straight years of dividend increases; yield 3.5%.

Note: among the supported companies, we dropped Sonec. Its civil engineering arm does public river, road and sewer work, but civil is only 5.4% of completed construction, and most of its government work is buildings such as schools. Among those needing review, we added Moriya, Kyowa Consultants and Dengyosha Machine Works, whose orders or backlog for public infrastructure grew. Fujii Sangyo, a trading company for construction materials and other goods, stays as needing review because its public infrastructure share is not given.

View detailed results

These results are from October 22, 2026. Qualitative judgments use the filings available at that time, while quantitative screening uses the latest financial data.

04 / Takeaway

Among policy-driven stocks, the overlooked ones stay cheap.

The six trade at 0.58 to 0.86 times book and 4.8 to 9.5 times earnings. Kajima, Taisei, Obayashi and Shimizu, which do the same public civil works, trade at 1.9 to 2.8 times book and about 15 times earnings. Five-year revenue growth is similar: 5 to 7% a year for the six, 7 to 10% for the big four.

The gap follows company size. Splitting Japan's 145 listed construction companies into five groups by market cap, the median P/B steps up at around ¥60 billion.

Market capMedian P/BBelow 1x book
¥0.6–9.2bn0.88x15 of 29
¥9.3–25.7bn0.72x19 of 29
¥27.5–63.9bn0.91x18 of 29
¥64.3–225.7bn1.33x4 of 29
¥225.8bn+1.90x1 of 29

Of the 87 companies worth ¥64 billion or less, 52 trade below book; of the 58 larger ones, only 5 do. Well-known, heavily traded companies get bought and rated higher. Regional builders and engineering consultants draw little attention even doing the same government work, and stay cheap. All six here are worth less than ¥30 billion.

Still, a company whose profit swings widely deserves a low price. Engineering consultants swing less. E-J Holdings earned ¥4.3 to ¥4.7 billion in operating income over the last five years, and CTI Engineering ¥7.0 to ¥10.0 billion. Big general contractors fix prices when they win a job, so rising material and labor costs eat into profit; Shimizu posted an operating loss for the year ended March 2024.

The resilience budget is set for five years. What we looked for are companies built on that work and left cheap because few are watching.

Your stock-picking, handed straight to AI.

Complex theses, your own selection rules. Katana narrows companies with its own metrics, and AI reads annual reports to judge qualitative conditions. The selection you used to do one company at a time, AI now runs across the Japanese market.

Open the screener

More examples

Power grid and transformer stocks, across all of Japan Stocks that benefit from rising rates, beyond the banks Hidden defense stocks, across all of Japan Nuclear fusion stocks, across all of Japan Companies that grow with cyberattacks, across all of Japan