刀 Japan Stock Screener
AI screening example · run on October 7, 2026

Security firms that grow
with attack-driven demand.

Most breaches start with unpatched VPN equipment, account takeover through contractors, or misconfiguration. We described the companies we wanted to Katana's AI, which drafted the conditions and read annual reports to find security-focused firms with growing sales and operating profit. Two were supported.

Background

The breaches came in through VPNs and accounts.

Japan's National Police Agency counted 123 ransomware reports in the first half of 2026, a record for a half year. Of the 36 cases with a known entry point, 18 came through VPN equipment and 9 through remote desktop: three in four used a door from the outside into the company network.

In September 2026, Japan's Digital Agency disclosed that about 246,000 personal records may have leaked from GSS, a shared government platform. An intruder exploited a VPN vulnerability and accessed files with a maintenance contractor's account.

On October 5, Osaka Metropolitan University disclosed a ransomware attack that stopped about 500 servers and encrypted most of its backups; the entry point has not been disclosed. Since late September, a string of web services have also reported break-ins, many through vulnerabilities in web software.

The disclosed causes are mostly mundane: missing patches, hijacked accounts and misconfiguration. So which companies are growing by meeting that demand? We checked with Katana, using financial data and annual reports.

01 / Input

The companies we wanted to find.

“Cyberattack damage now comes mainly from unpatched VPN equipment, account takeover through contractors, and misconfiguration. We want companies whose sales and profits are growing by capturing demand for these countermeasures, and whose sales and profits would keep growing if that demand rose further. Limited to companies whose main business is security products or services for other companies.”

Entered in Japanese; English translation.

We entered this profile in Japanese in Katana's AI search. To the conditions the AI drafted, we added a word condition on the business description (any of eight security terms), which left 30 companies for the AI to read.

02 / Conditions

The conditions we applied across Japan.

A

Quantitative

Katana computes its metrics for every company.

  1. Three-year revenue CAGR ≥ 0%
  2. Three-year operating income CAGR ≥ 0%
  3. Latest operating income ≥ 0
  4. Business description mentions any of eight security terms (cybersecurity, vulnerability assessment, multi-factor authentication, security assessment, zero trust, penetration testing, leak prevention)
B

Qualitative

AI reads each annual report and judges support and counterevidence.

  1. Are security products or services for other companies described as a major segment or a pillar of revenue?
  2. In that business, does the company provide at least one fix for the three causes: vulnerability assessment and management, multi-factor authentication and privileged-access management, or configuration assessment?
  3. Does revenue grow with contracts or usage while costs do not grow alike, through software fees, shared platforms or automation?

The AI reads the questions in order and stops at the first one with counterevidence. Internal use, incidental sales and future plans do not count.

~3,800listed companies
30match the numbers
2AI judged as supported
Katana

read the filings and supported two companies.

03 / Results

Two supported. We also checked the companies that stopped.

Of 30 companies, two were supported, 16 need review and 12 had counterevidence. Nearly every security specialist passed the first question on main business. The second question was narrowly worded: even HENNGE, a multi-factor authentication provider, fell short. Below are the two supported companies and four that split.

  • Cyber Security Cloud4493 · Information & Communication

    Its main service detects, blocks and visualizes attacks on web applications from the cloud.Filing ↗Supported on all three questions (the second at a borderline 51%). Revenue grew 31% a year for three years.

  • TechMatrix3762 · Information & Communication

    Acquired Firmus, Malaysia's largest cybersecurity company, in November 2024.Filing ↗Supported (the second question at a borderline 50%). It sells and runs security products and bought a Malaysian security firm.

  • HENNGE4475 · Information & Communication

    Its main service, HENNGE One, is billed as an annual flat-fee subscription.Filing ↗Needs review. A multi-factor authentication company that passed questions one and three, but scored 44% on the second: the question was too narrow.

  • Amiya4258 · Information & Communication

    Develops, makes and sells its own cybersecurity products and services.Filing ↗Needs review. It sells monitoring and vulnerability assessment for a fixed monthly fee and passed question three at 78%, but scored 49% on the second.

  • Global Security Experts4417 · Information & Communication

    A cybersecurity company built around education and consulting for mid-sized firms.Filing ↗Counterevidence. Security is its main business (95% on question one), but the AI read its education and consulting as needing more people to deliver more.

  • Kinjiro4013 · Information & Communication

    Offers single sign-on and multi-factor authentication as part of its HR software.Filing ↗Counterevidence. It offers multi-factor authentication, but its main business is HR and attendance software, so it failed question one.

View detailed results

These results are from October 7, 2026. Qualitative judgments use the filings available at that time, while quantitative screening uses the latest financial data.

04 / Takeaway

They grew alike. The difference is cost when demand rises.

If the causes are mundane, so are the fixes: find vulnerabilities, add a second login factor, check settings. Our questions picked companies built on those products, then asked whether profit would rise with demand.

The third question split them. Companies selling their own cloud or monthly services were supported; one delivering education and consulting through people got counterevidence.

CompanyQ3Revenue 3y CAGROp. income 3y CAGROp. margin
Cyber Security CloudSupported+30.7%+41.9%21.7%
AmiyaSupported+25.7%+58.6%17.7%
HENNGESupported+24.6%+57.1%16.4%
Global Security ExpertsCounter+25.6%+44.8%20.3%

On three years of numbers, the people-driven firm grew just as fast. The gap appears when demand rises again: a cloud service can add contracts with few new staff, while a people-delivered service has to hire to do more work.

Figures are results up to the latest annual report and do not indicate future sales or profit.

Your stock-picking, handed straight to AI.

Complex theses, your own selection rules. Katana narrows companies with its own metrics, and AI reads annual reports to judge qualitative conditions. The selection you used to do one company at a time, AI now runs across the Japanese market.

Open the screener Another example: Companies quietly in semiconductors. Another example: Companies like Nintendo, across all of Japan. Another example: Companies like UNIQLO, across all of Japan. Another example: Recurring revenue, across Japan. Another example: Cheap, growing physical-AI stocks, across all of Japan.